Friday, January 8, 2010

What is wrong with Yahoo Beta mail - I keep getting Login error Object expected. I did upgrade to ie7?

It's beta...that's why. All the kinks haven't been worked out.





And IE7 has been giving some programs issues...you might want to go back to original Yahoo until your sure that it's IE7 that is't doing this.


I take classes online and IE7 interfers with the program that we have to use.What is wrong with Yahoo Beta mail - I keep getting Login error Object expected. I did upgrade to ie7?
both yahoo beta and ie7 are badWhat is wrong with Yahoo Beta mail - I keep getting Login error Object expected. I did upgrade to ie7?
Friends on line from Alaska to Florida have been having problems, with there connections as well, they all downloaded the new IE7. Sorry you'll have to go back to the old version if you can, and wait for them to fix the bugs.
I am about to drop IE7 because of those issues, send bug reports and nothing happens. They tried there best to copy Netscape, and tell us that we cannot copy a dvd that we bought. I am using SeaMonkey now for 3 days, no cross platform errors whatsoever, but everything went loopy after IE7 was installed. Of course it will be the only one for windows, one day, but for now, no thanks.
its problematic indeed
  • liquid color try
  • fragrance oil
  • A 10.0g object moving to the right at 20.0 cm/s makes an elastic head on collision with a 15.0g object moving?

    in the opposite direction at 30.0 cm/s. Find the velocity of each object after the collision.A 10.0g object moving to the right at 20.0 cm/s makes an elastic head on collision with a 15.0g object moving?
    Prior to the collision, the 10.0g object has velocity 20.0 and the 15.0g object has velocity -30.0 . After the collision, the 10.0g object has velocity v1 and the 15.0g object has velocity v2.





    Momentum is preserved, so


    10(20)+15(-30)=10v1+15v2


    -250=10v1+15v2


    10v1=-250-15v2


    v1=-25-1.5v2


    Since the collision is elastic, kinetic energy is preserved, so


    5(20)虏+7.5(-30)虏=5(v1)虏+7.5(v2)虏


    8750=5(v1)虏+7.5(v2)虏


    substituting for v1 we get


    8750=5(-25-1.5v2)虏+7.5(v2)虏


    8750=5(625+75v2+2.25v2虏)+7.5v2虏


    8750=3125+375v2+11.25v2虏+7.5v2虏


    0=-5625+375v2+18.75v2虏


    using the quadratic formula, we get


    v2= (-375 卤 750) / 37.5


    which has two solutions: v2=-30 or v2=10


    plugging these back into v1=-25-1.5v2 we get


    v1=20 or v1=-40 respectively.





    Solution #1: v1=20 %26amp; v2=-30 : This solution is impossible because it has the left-hand object moving to the right and the right-hand object moving to the left, as if they had passed right through each other.





    Solution #2: v1=-40 and v2=10 : This is the correct solution. After the collision, the 10g object is moving 40.0 cm/s to the left and the 15g object is moving 10.0 cm/s to the right.

    What is the most memorable sensual feeling you had about an object unrelated to typical sex?

    For example, mine was when I was at Magic Mountain where I imagined my vagina engulfing the Goliath ride. Hard to explain, but the weather was scorching and I felt hot and delusional. I was kinda aroused by the thought of the ride's car flying up to the top of me.What is the most memorable sensual feeling you had about an object unrelated to typical sex?
    MY DETACHABLE SHOWER HEAD. ENOUGH SAID.What is the most memorable sensual feeling you had about an object unrelated to typical sex?
    After drinking several glasses of wine, I felt excited down there.
    Ummmm.....sitting on the washer during the spin cycle?? lol
    No offense but rofl. i love you
    an ***

    Is it possible to enter the womb with long penis or object?

    you already asked this question. are you a troll?





    impossible for a penis. don't flatter yourself.Is it possible to enter the womb with long penis or object?
    ha ha unless your penis measures a foot then NO.





    Plus the womb is very tight and close, and also protected by the mucus plug, nothing is coming in it.Is it possible to enter the womb with long penis or object?
    no not really, the womb is too far up inside a woman.

    Do most languages in the world use a structure of subject, object, and then verb?

    in KoreanDo most languages in the world use a structure of subject, object, and then verb?
    Yes, subject, object, verb [SOV] is the most common. English and the Romance languages are SVO, although most have special cases where other orders are understood (especially in questions or certain tenses).





    For example, in English we can say ';With whom did you speak?'; [OSV] or things called locative inversions, where [(O)VS] occurs ';In the garden sat a cat';.





    On this also depends the presence or absence of a declension system (synthetic). English has mostly lost its declension although bits remain (whom vs. who, him vs. he). This makes for a generally more rigid word order. Languages like Latin have very strong declension systems. Also, Slavic languages like Polish and Russian retain the system. For example: Latin ';Meam matrem amo ego'; (lit.: My mother love I), ';Amo meam matrem ego'; (lit. Love my mother I), ';Ego amo meam matrem'; (lit: I love my mother), and ';Meam matrem amo (ego)'; (lit. My mother love (I) [the I could and mostly was left out because of the conjugation system of verbs]) are all perfectly understandable, with the last being the most common.





    Sorry for writing so much! I just love topics like this so much, so I get carried away. You can e-mail me with ANY questions! I love this grammo-linguistic stuff so much!!!Do most languages in the world use a structure of subject, object, and then verb?
    No, the subject/verb/object structure we use in English is the most common.

    According to Newton's second law of motion, what does an object with more mass require?

    more force to accelerate


    more distance to accelerate


    less force to accelerate


    less speed to accelerate


    Whats the correct answer?According to Newton's second law of motion, what does an object with more mass require?
    F=ma, so more mass means, more force to accelerate.According to Newton's second law of motion, what does an object with more mass require?
    F=ma





    If the mass is the same, then the greater the mass, the smaller the acceleration. Therefore, if the mass increases, the force has to increase to give the same acceleration





    Actually, you can use daily experiences. For example, you need more force to carry an empty bag than a bag filled with books.





    Newton's second law did not deal with distance and speed at all, so discard those two.






    the acceleration of an object is proportional to the force applied, and inversely proportional to the mass of the object.





    So an object with more mass will require more force to accelerate.
    Force = mass *acceleration


    So it needs more force to accelerate



    force = mass * acceleration ,more acceleration

    I need help. How do I find the trajectory of an object?

    When I was reading one of my books that talks about physics and it started talking about the trajectory of a cannon that went in an arc shape. I read it a few times, but I couldn't understand it. I want someone to show step by step how to explain how you get the trajectory of an object.I need help. How do I find the trajectory of an object?
    The formal for finding the trajectory of an object is as follows:





    who+cares= no oneI need help. How do I find the trajectory of an object?
    galileo studied projectiles and found that they moved in two directions at the same time. he determined that the motion of a projectile follows the curved path of a parabola. the parabolic path of a projectile is called its trajectory. the shape of a projectiles trajectory depends on its initial velocity-both its initial speed and direction- and on the accleeration due to graity. to understand and analyze projectile motion, you need to consider the horizontal and vertical components of the objects motion seperately.gravity influences he vertical motion of a projectile by acceleratin it downward. note that gravity has no effect on an objects horizontal motion. so the two components of a projectiles motion can be considered independentaly. as a result a projectile experiences both uniform motion and uniformely accelerated motion at the same time.





    x direction = d=vt


    y direction= d=Vit=1/2at^2
  • liquid color try
  • fragrance oil
  • Two forces, of magnitude 4N and 10N, are applied to an object. The relative direction of the force is uknown?

    The net force acting on the object....


    More than one answer okay


    A) cannot be equal to 5N


    B) cannot be equal to 10N


    C) cannot be directed the same way as the force of 10N


    D) must be greater than 10NTwo forces, of magnitude 4N and 10N, are applied to an object. The relative direction of the force is uknown?
    aTwo forces, of magnitude 4N and 10N, are applied to an object. The relative direction of the force is uknown?
    a and b is right
    the answer is a,b,c because the force of 10N cannot be push back by a 4N


    The differences of 10N-4N=6N and the net so a and b state that it not 10N or 5N.
    It is A only. Trust me, I am doing the exact same assignment.





    Since force is a vector quantity deduce the smallest possible force and the largest force using different


    combination for orientation of the force vectors. Smallest, when the two forces are in opposite direction and largest,


    when they are in the same direction.

    What animal/object reminds you of a girl?

    Not like the actual female symbol, but something of that nature.What animal/object reminds you of a girl?
    hmm...


    well you're in the wrong forum, but hey


    I think it depends on the girl. I have a friend who's a fox. and another who's a minx. and another who's a hawk... soo... go figure.What animal/object reminds you of a girl?
    A cello or bass viol.
    Trees, all girls want to be skinny meaning sticks equal trees
    Dishes! WOOO!! I did some today... with pride. :)
    A female of the species Homo sapiens.

    How do I add a vertex to an object in 3ds Max 8?

    Like, if I have a cube, how do I put a vertex between the two top left ones, in the middle of the side?How do I add a vertex to an object in 3ds Max 8?
    right click the cube, convert to editable poly. go to vertex sub object mode (red dots) and select two of the vertices diagonally on the side you want. right click, connect. switch to edge sub object mode, select your new line, right click, insert vertex. then click where you want the new vertex to be.

    What does it mean to ';stub your toe'; I think it is hitting any stationary object and wife does not?

    I think it is bumping your toe on an inanimate object that you probably didn't see.What does it mean to ';stub your toe'; I think it is hitting any stationary object and wife does not?
    Stub is used to refer to toes almost exclusively, don't ask me why. The dictionary definition defines it as hitting a toe on something. I have heard it used for fingers but rarely. I have never heard anyone say they stubbed their forehead on the range hood, for instance, or stubbed their knee, or that they stubbed a nail with a hammer. It means toes, just live with it.What does it mean to ';stub your toe'; I think it is hitting any stationary object and wife does not?
    Tripping on an inanimate object, I don't think kicking the cat qualifies.

    Hand still hurts a month after punching solid object?

    I stupidly lost my temper a bit more than a month ago, and punched the roof of my car from inside. There wasn't really any immediate pain. However, about a week or two after, I noticed that if I applied light pressure to the pinky knuckle area, it hurts.





    It's been over a month now, and this is still occurring. What is likely the issue? It functions fine, so I wouldn't think it was broken or anything, but then again, I'm not a doctor. Thank you!Hand still hurts a month after punching solid object?
    With a temper like that you should invest in a soft top Dude

    What is the lifespan of mrsa on an object?

    like if my shoe which was in an infectedf home is on my floor, how long will it be able to live on there?


    if mty home is now infected with mrsa can i have my kids leave for two weeks and the bacteria is gone?


    if i am in a home of someone with mrsa yet they are on the super deeduper antibiotics, is she still highhly contagious to hug?What is the lifespan of mrsa on an object?
    I think it did.
  • liquid color try
  • fragrance oil
  • How do you get a perimeter of an object?

    how?How do you get a perimeter of an object?
    The perimeter of a shape is the distance around it (add up all the sides.)





    An 'object' is 3 dimensional and does not have a perimeter as such. 'Perimeter' usually applies to 2-dimensional shapes only.How do you get a perimeter of an object?
    add all of its sides.
    add all the sides of the path you take
    add up all of its sides (i learned it like 5 years ago)
    just add the lengths of the sides.
    The perimeter of an object is the sum of all its sides.


    Just add all the sides together and you have your perimeter for that object.


    For example:


    Find the perimeter of the rectangle with sides with lengths of 4 in and 5 in


    A rectangle has 4 sides, with 2 pairs of equal-length sides


    4 in + 4 in + 5 in + 5 in = 18 in


    18 inches is the perimter of the rectangle
    add up the sides, but if it's a square, just take one and multiply it by 4.
    you can If the object is in two-dimension, use a rope to measure the perimeter.

    How do you make a Sims 2 Item/object?

    And I don't mean hair, eyes, clothes, and ECT!!!How do you make a Sims 2 Item/object?
    i highly suggest http://www.modthesims2.com.





    it is an awesome site with loads of sims 2 tutorials.





    here is a link for object creation: http://www.modthesims2.com/forumdisplay.鈥?/a>





    you have to sign up to post anything but its free

    How would you decrease the momentum of an object?

    decrease potential energy.....through physical factors like friction....How would you decrease the momentum of an object?
    This is wrong. If something is moving it has kinetic energy. You decrease the momentum with friction, but you are lowering the kinetic energy.


    KINETIC energy is related to momentum through this formula:





    ((m*v)^2)/(2*m).... where m*v is equal to momentum. Report Abuse
    How would you decrease the momentum of an object?
    If you decrease its mass or its velocity (or, if you want to be really hardcore, its change in the product of mass and velocity). Velocity is a vector which has a defined negative and positive direction, so I would hit it in the negative direction. With a baseball bat.





    This has the benefit of decreasing the momentum even if the object is not moving.
    Newton's First Law: Every body continues in its state of rest or of uniform motion unless an implied force acts upon it.





    Therefore, to decrease the momentum of a moving object, an implied force must act upon it.
    force = mass*acceleration, and acceleration is equal to velocity/time. So multiply force*time and you get mass*velocity, which are the units of momentum. This force*time is called impluse and it is how you change momentum. If you want you, can also think of kinetic energy as p^2/(2m), and in this case you can see directly that when you change the kinetic energy you are changing the momentum.
    Friction
    by decreasin its velocity or mass
    By applying an impulse in the direction opposing the direction of motion.

    What's difference between treating someone as an object and treating someone as a person?

    In the bible Song 2: 8-17..i need help please!! BEST GETS 10 :]What's difference between treating someone as an object and treating someone as a person?
    The latter engenders respect, the former not so much.What's difference between treating someone as an object and treating someone as a person?
    go to a bdsm web sight and look it up.
    A hooker is an object





    A wife is a person





    ;-)





    Sgs 2:8 ';Ah, I hear him-my lover! Here he comes, leaping on the mountains and bounding over the hills.


    Sgs 2:9 My lover is like a swift gazelle or a young deer. Look, there he is behind the wall! Now he is looking in through the window, gazing into the room.


    Sgs 2:10 ';My lover said to me, `Rise up, my beloved, my fair one, and come away.


    Sgs 2:11 For the winter is past, and the rain is over and gone.


    Sgs 2:12 The flowers are springing up, and the time of singing birds has come, even the cooing of turtledoves.


    Sgs 2:13 The fig trees are budding, and the grapevines are in blossom. How delicious they smell! Yes, spring is here! Arise, my beloved, my fair one, and come away.' '; [Young Man:]


    Sgs 2:14 ';My dove is hiding behind some rocks, behind an outcrop on the cliff. Let me see you; let me hear your voice. For your voice is pleasant, and you are lovely.'; [Young Women of Jerusalem:]


    Sgs 2:15 ';Quick! Catch all the little foxes before they ruin the vineyard of your love, for the grapevines are all in blossom.'; [Young Woman:]


    Sgs 2:16 ';My lover is mine, and I am his. He feeds among the lilies!


    Sgs 2:17 Before the dawn comes and the shadows flee away, come back to me, my love. Run like a gazelle or a young stag on the rugged mountains.[fn2]';
    You can't take advantage of them, no matter their race, sex, religion, at all.





    HUMAN RACE UNITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    haha.

    Whats the difference between a direct object and an indirect object?

    Thanks so much!!Whats the difference between a direct object and an indirect object?
    In a sentence the Subject is the one that does the action.





    the one that is acted upon is the direct object.





    the that receives the action is the indirect action.





    usually you can recognize the indirect object because it is preceeded by the word ';to';





    for example :





    I gave the banana to the monkey.





    Now to confuse things, sometimes we reorganize the sentence. We say: I gave the monkey the banana.





    Usually if there is no ';to'; in the sentence, usually the first noun is the indirect object, and the second is the direct object.





    Hope this helps





    BryanWhats the difference between a direct object and an indirect object?
    Direct object -- directly receives the action of the verb





    Indirect object -- precedes the ';direct object,'; and receives it as the party to whom or for whom the action of the verb is done.





    Examples:


    I broke the pencil.


    * ';broke'; is the verb


    * ';pencil'; is the ';direct object'; which receives the action


    (the ';pencil'; is the object that was ';broken';).





    I gave Mother the pencil.


    * ';gave'; is the verb


    * ';pencil'; is still the ';direct object'; which receives the action


    (the pencil is the object that was ';given';)


    * Mother is the ';indirect'; object


    The person or object to whom


    the ';pencil'; (direct object) was ';given'; (verb)





    I read you the book.


    * ';read'; is the verb


    * ';book'; is the direct object (that is being read)


    * ';you'; is the indirect object (person to whom the book is read)

    You can see an object when the light hitting it is?

    A. absorbed.


    B. unevenly reflected.


    C. evenly reflected.


    D. transmitted.You can see an object when the light hitting it is?
    C. Unevenly reflected means that light reflecting back at you could come in any angle. This you can see in a mirror that has been smashed dramatically to the extent where you can't see your face.You can see an object when the light hitting it is?
    Unless we are looking at the source, everything we See is because of Reflected light. When there is no light at all we see nothing. C. would be the best answer.e
    b- the light you see is the only light reflected by the object, all other light is absorbed
    absorbed all but reemmited specific rays of light(depending on material).Thats why in one sun light we can see diff. coloure of everything.
    B
    B
    Not a. if absorbed no light reaches your eye.


    Not d. Most objects do not emit light like your screen is.


    If the light is coming from your left and is evenly reflected off a flat surface where will it go. Imagine a ball bouncing off a wall.





    Only some light has to reach your eye. A wall can be easier to see than a flat glass door.





    Hope that helps you with your homework.
  • liquid color try
  • fragrance oil
  • How can: an accelerating object with a negative velocity have a positive acceleration?

    explain to me how you define an accelerationg object as having a positive vs. negative acceleration, not direction.


    how can


    an accelerating object with a positive velocity have a positive acceleration...


    BUT ALSO


    an accelerating object with a negative velocity have a positive acceleration?


    the tutorial im reading says:


    The general RULE OF THUMB is:


    If an object is slowing down, then its acceleration is in the opposite direction of its motion.


    this RULE OF THUMB can be applied to determine whether the sign of the acceleration of an object is positive or negative, right or left, up or down, etc. Consider the two data tables below.


    in Example A, the object is moving in the positive direction (i.e., has a positive velocity) and is speeding up. When an object is speeding up, the acceleration is in the same direction as the velocity. Thus, this object has a positive acceleration.


    In Example B, the object is moving in the negative direction (i.e., has a negative velocity) and is slowing down. When an object is slowing down, the acceleration is in the opposite direction as the velocity. Thus, this object also has a positive acceleration.How can: an accelerating object with a negative velocity have a positive acceleration?
    acceleration is changing the direction of motionHow can: an accelerating object with a negative velocity have a positive acceleration?
    It's slowing down. A negative velocity can be interpreted as a motion from right to left, and a positive acceleration will bring it to a stop. A continuation of the positive acceleration will cause it to start moving to the right. Both the velocity and acceleration are positive to the right.
    Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity over time.





    Imagine yourself in a car traveling in reverse, lets say at 20 mph. Now imagine the car still going backwards, but going slower, now at 15 mph 5 seconds later. Your velocity is still negative at -15 mph but your acceleration is toward the front at 5 mph/ 1 seconds or one mph per second. This might seem counter-intuitive because of the signs. (It is easier to think of it as deceleration in a negative direction, but two negatives make a positive, right)


    But think of it like this, if your acceleration remains constant then in another 5 seconds you will be going backwards at only 10 mph. 5 seconds more and you are only going 5 mph backward. Another 5 seconds later and you are at a dead stop for a second and now starting to travel forward instead of backward. Another 5 seconds and you are traveling forward at 5 mph and accelerating forward even faster. Our acceleration has not changed but now that the car has changed direction and is traveling forward, it might be easier to see that the acceleration is positive.


    The object with negative velocity will probably not keep its negative velocity long with a positive acceleration. It will eventually slow to a stop and then develop positive velocity.





    I hope this helps a little
    Traditionally, an object moving along a graph from left to right is said to be moving in the positive direction, while an object moving from right to left is said to be moving in the negative direction.


    This is merely a convenience - after all, an object can't really have a negative speed.


    The sign merely indicates the direction of the motion.


    The same convention applies to the object's acceleration.





    Remember that the velocity and the acceleration of an object are two separate things.


    The velocity is the rate of change of position, while acceleration is the rate of change of velocity.
    Acceleration is the measure of the force applied - so an object slows down as a result of an accelerating force applied against the direction of motion.





    Another way to say it is that the object in motion is not accelerating (either positively or negatively), it is being acted on by an outside agent (force) which has positive acceleration.

    How do people make Black and White photos have one object thats color?

    For Example


    http://www.flickr.com/photos/crazyrn/225鈥?/a>How do people make Black and White photos have one object thats color?
    A easy way to do this, if you don't know how to use photoshop is to use www.picnik.com , you just upload your image , then go to edit , and after that you go to create, and then you make the image black and white, and then you use the paint brush to select the areas you want in colorHow do people make Black and White photos have one object thats color?
    As is true of many procedures in Photoshop, there are several ways of doing selective color. This is a quick and easy method.





    First open your photo in PS of course.





    Then go to Layer - Duplicate Layer





    Click OK





    Then go to Image - Adjustments - Hue / Saturation





    Drag the Saturation slider all the way to the left to make the photo black and white.





    Click OK





    Then get the ERASER tool from the tool box on the left side of the screen. It is usually the next tool under the clone stamp tool. Just hover your mouse over the tool, and it will say Eraser.





    When you have selected the Eraser, go up to the Brush options box at the top of the screen, and click on the downfacing arrow. Set the Hardness of the brush to 100% so you will have accurate control of selection. You may also need to raise or lower the brush size to suit.





    Erase away any black and white from where you want the color to be revealed.





    When done go to


    Layer - Flatten Image





    Then just do a Save As to wherever you want to save the photo.





    hope this helps you





    steve
    I used photoshop for this. It started as a color photo, I created 3 layers, the base was the color, the other two greyscale. I did that so that I could enhance the area above the dam. I simply erased the black and white area around the color figure, showing the colored layer underneath.
    use program called Picasa.





    http://picasa.google.com/- it is a free dwonload- and an awesome program!!
    Actually, you would take a color photo, and use filters when developing film. Another option is to use computer programs like Adobe Photoshop to alter any photo.


    I have done this type of thing in college photography courses using film, and I always used filters on the developing bench as well as on the 35mm camera.

    Qualitaively investigate the effectiveness of 3 methods of preventing an object containing iron from corrosion?

    What a messed-up way of asking a simple question - how do you keep metal from going rusty...





    Here's 3 methods:





    1. Keep it oiled


    2. Paint it


    3. Anodise it





    You go on and ';qualitaively investigate'; them, whatever that means.Qualitaively investigate the effectiveness of 3 methods of preventing an object containing iron from corrosion?
    Well there are various methods.However, I would choose a) Painting/coating, b) Galvanising, c) Electroplating. All three provided excellent protection from corrosion by preventing oxidation of the surface of the object. Painting has a limited life and can easily be damaged so needs re-coating after time. Galvanising acts as a sacrificial cathodic coating and therefore provides excellent long-term protection but is a soft coating of zinc so can be damaged easily by abrasion. Electroplating may be decorative or a functional coating (e.g. Chrome or Nickle) and some finishes will degrade in time without regular maintenance or additional coating but it can provide a very hard wear resistant surface for moving parts.Qualitaively investigate the effectiveness of 3 methods of preventing an object containing iron from corrosion?
    1. Put it in oil?


    2. Wrap it in fish?


    3. Cook it?





    Maybe not 2 or 3 but I'm sure 1 is ok.

    This may sound stupid but could you name be an object?

    i need a none living object to draw and bring to life , anyone got any ideas? im stuck 4 good ones, any object u don't even need to tell me what to do with it , thanks in advance xxThis may sound stupid but could you name be an object?
    StoolThis may sound stupid but could you name be an object?
    a living cellphone
    a mop
    a teddy bear!
    shoes..something cute and with a heel and girly should be easy to add eyes and a mouth to and you can make it fun
    Apple.


    Fruits work good.
    this is an stupid question so don't ask it again I'm speaking from the heart i have a question for you did u enjoy your adolecence or not
    How about a mirror? Everything is fine until your drawing is finished and then images appear from the mirror etc...
    a Kettle
    A molecule of table salt.
    a book
    well a guess it's a object, the dawn (with is my name :D)
    A bottle
    What about a candle, or sizzers or a shoe or a bottle, or a cup or a chest (like atreasure chest) or a hanger or a blanket just a few objects that i thought of
    computer keyboard and speakers?
    whatever's on your desk.
    a glass half filled








    a book








    a single drop of water








    a candle








    chandelier








    the moon








    a dead rose








    a ruler








    handcuffs
    Perhaps an antic vase.
    A climbing vine is an option, like ivy. That could be brought to life in a picture pretty easily, I would think.
    is this for facebook????? i googled ';objects brought to life'; and this is what i got...im looking for one too so, thanks for the suggestions!!!!
    drawing anything plastic is fun


    starbucks plastic cup


    with the straw


    and some napkins and sugar packets


    ipod is too typical if your in an art class


    tennis shoes are hard





    hands are awsome


    i highly recomend them
    your dinner plate
    A vase
    a teapot! hahah. or maybe a refrigerator... I had a nightmare about one of those coming alive once.
    lightbulb
    How about at toothbrush....


    or a cool lookin' chair!





    Think of Beauty and the Beast characters.....


    fork


    cup


    clock


    candle stick


    broom





    or modern day......cell phone?


    Or a Chevron car (remember those toy ones)
    Cartoonist do this sort of thing all the time in character development. For example, you may be ask to bring a tin of beans to life and characterize it or an onion that cries for example. The latter is a joke I have used from time to time. You can do this with anything and examples include; pens, pencils, cans, fruit and vegetables.


    If I'm doing something like this I get a large sheet of paper and just start sketching. I play with the shapes and give then noses eyes and mouths. I try lots of excretions to see how they work with the character I have created. If after as few minutes work you feel that it's not working for you then try something else and eventually something will click and you will have a character you are happy with and you can draw up into a full character study.





    John
    A bicycle.
    skateboard
    pencil or computerr or spaghetti or lamp or book or candle or tree or christmas tree or gifts :] have funn !!








    how will u ever choose best answerr ?! lol
    a Pen or Mabey a shoe

    Do you know ANY OBJECT that you microwave for one minute and is STILL HOT after half hour?

    It has to be still hot after 30 minutesDo you know ANY OBJECT that you microwave for one minute and is STILL HOT after half hour?
    I would suggest a glass thermos bottle full of water.Do you know ANY OBJECT that you microwave for one minute and is STILL HOT after half hour?
    Hot pockets stay hot forever after you microwave them. Whatever it is, poke some holes in it with a fork or cut it into pieces to let the heat escape.
    yup. a small bed buddy...you know those things filled with dry rice of something like that that you put in the microwave then you put them in your sheets. ^^ i love them
    McDonald's hot apple pie?
    brass maybe....

    Is there any reason to use a struct over an object in C++?

    I'm still new to the language, but is there any reason someone would use a struct over an object? It seems like a struct is just a lesser version of an object.Is there any reason to use a struct over an object in C++?
    You would only use an object when the item requires behaviours in addition to having data (attributes). No hard and fast rule but typically if you are only keeping data together you would use a struct.





    This gives some more information http://csharpthegreat.blogspot.com/2009/鈥?/a>





    ========


    Sorry on the lesser version comment - yeah, that is true. C++ objects were derived from struct definitions in C. You can think of structs as dumb objects.Is there any reason to use a struct over an object in C++?
    Struct is not a ';lesser'; version of class. It's 100% identical to a class, but instead of having default private members it has default public members.





    First poster is completely wrong too.





    The only reason that I see for using structs is to write a C-compatible code. Note that C's structs are indeed a ';limited'; version of a class, which cannot contain member functions, constructors/destructors, access specifiers, etc... only member fields.
    In C, structs cannot contain member functions. They can contain other structs or primitive data types. C does not have classes.





    In C++, there are classes, which are like structs, except they can contain executable code called member functions or methods. A struct in C++ is actually a class, except for the assumptions made on the privacy level of its members, as outlined by Mr. Mehoff, so they can contain code, unlike C.





    In C++, there is no reason that I can think of to use a struct. The best way would be to use the class and be explicit about the privacy level of its members, or follow the conventions used by your organization.





    In C, there is every reason to use structs. It's the only thing you have to really build data structures with.





    Furthermore, structs and classes are even more different in C#. C# uses the C syntax, and many containers in C# were derived from the containers in the STL. All similarity to C# ends there. In C#, structs are 'value' types whereas classes are 'reference' types. In C++, they're all values, and if you want a reference to it then by God you just make yourself a pointer and you can have it. It is your Ritchie-Straustrup-given right.
  • liquid color try
  • fragrance oil
  • What must a vibrating object have in order to generate electromagnectic waves?

    em waves are usually associated with the oscillatory motion of charged particles such as electrons.

    Does the Easter Bunny object to gay or interracial marriage?

    Yeah, but only because he'll take any excuse he can to get out of marrying his boyfriend.Does the Easter Bunny object to gay or interracial marriage?
    I am sure that loki feels right at home with gay marriage in the scheme of things since he doesn't want to 'convince' some of his existence.





    Loading the question with two issues so that an affirmative or denial response is questionable at best. No difference between racial issues and without regard to these things is the advancement of the Gospel. Yet, there is nothing new under the sun. The marriage was for people not to be yoked together with the unfaithful was the only admonishment. Must both be believers unless willing to stay together in faithfullness regardless.Does the Easter Bunny object to gay or interracial marriage?
    Look, this 'Bunny' character basically breaks onto peoples' properties and leaves 'bait' to lure their kids out!








    He's got bigger issues than opposing gay marriage..........
    I thought the Easter Bunny was gay. Well if he did oppose gay marriage, he wouldn't be the first closeted bigot to do so. Interracial? now that would be funny coming from a rabbit.
    yeah definitely. but bunnies are always randomly f*cking around so adultery is way chill.
    no, just think about it, the Easter Bunny's parents was a chicken and a rabbit
    I'm sure if someone was to ask, the easter bunny wouldn't be cool with two guys f*cking each other in their 氓ssholes.
    Actually, the Easter Bunny encourages lesbianism.
    No. He doesn't care. He is only interested in selling a lot of chocolate bunnies and eggs.
    Happiness and mixed colors! That is what easter is all about right?!
    The Easter Bunny only objects to chickens who don't pay him on time.
    only when you put your chocolate in my peanut butter.
    No, its just a general thing, for everyone.
    Yes, the Easter Bunny is a total @ss.
    You can't be serious!
    No not at all. Look at the colors he uses.
    no

    How do scientists know just by looking at a distant object how many light years it is from earth?

    There are a number of ways, depending on the type and distance of the object.





    Nearby stars' distances can be triangulated using the ';parallax'; method, in which you carefully measure the position of the star against the distant background at six month intervals, using the Earth's orbit as the base of the triangle.





    More distant stars' distance can be measure by observing their spectra. Stars of a particular color and spectral type have known intrinsic (called ';absolute';) brightnesses. By comparing the intrinsic brightness with the observed brightness you know the distance.





    Still other types of stars have periodic pulsations in their luminosity. Such stars (called ';Cepheid Variables';) have a known relationship between their intrinsic brightness and their period of pulsation. Hence their distance can be determined as well. Cepheids can be observed at very great distances, and so can be used as ';standard candles'; to measure the distance of other galaxies.How do scientists know just by looking at a distant object how many light years it is from earth?
    The best way to do this , is pick a star at around midnight , your local time, when the sun,earth and the star that you picked, form a straight line. Or as close to a straight line as you can.


    In 3 months time you observe, and take measurements of the star's position in the sky.


    Wait 6 months longer, and do the same thing.


    With the information that you have , you can use parallax to figure how distant that star is from our solar system.How do scientists know just by looking at a distant object how many light years it is from earth?
    no they need to do some reserch, pinpionting and stuff like that.
    dEPENDS ON HOW MUCH zoom they do to see the object for example by a telescope....


    image distance=object distance


    speed of of light=3.0 x 10^8
    For stars they can determine the distance by studying the light. The spectrum of a star can tell you just about everything about it.


    Parallax is used for nearby objects and since quite a few stars are close enough to be measured using parallax we have learned a great deal about those stars. And if we then see a star that is much farther away we can find its distance by comparing its spectrum with that of a star for which the distance is known. We can then calculate at which distance the known star would have to be from earth to appear as bright as the star being studied. Some stars, called cepheid variables, allows scientists to measure the distance to the galaxy they are in.


    For things like molecular clouds stars are again used as milemarkers. Here the distance to a star in the foreground or the background of the cloud is measured, leving an estimate of the distance to the cloud.
    It depends. For really distant objects (billions of light years away) they know the objects will be moving away from us faster the further away they are. This causes the light to be shiftend in frequency (look up the ';Doppler Effect). By measuring the size of the shift, they can estimate the distance.





    For stars, etc. closer (in our galaxy) they basically use simple trigonometry. Here's how: astronomers will take (very precise) measurements when the Earth is on one side of the Sun and then 6 months later when its on the other side. That givs us the base of a triangle (with the star at the apex)--and two of the angles. With that imformation you can calculate the lengths of all three sides--and either of the other two will be the distance to the star.


    In practice, we have instruments precise enough today you don't have to wait the entire 6 month's (which gives you the longest base for the triangle); just wait long enough for the earth to move a little way along its orbit. But the method is identical either way.
    Astronom... is correct, but I'd like to add something. Distances to very distant objects with which cepheids can't be used (because of the distance the cepheids are too faint to resolve) are estimated using just a general estimate.





    For example, spiral galaxies have average intrinsic brightnesses, so a very distant one is assumed to have a similar intrinsic brightness. It's apparent brightness versus it's intrinsic brightness gives its apparent distance.





    A better estimate can be made if there is a supernova observed in that galaxy. Using it's spectrum a good estimate of the intrinsic brightness of the supernova can be found, and the distance estimated more closely. Years ago, before Cepheids were used, this method was used to determine that the Andromeda Galaxy is, indeed, an object outside our Milky Way. Interestingly, though, the intrinsic brightness of the supernova involved was underestimated, and the distance underestimated accordingly (the distance was still very large).
    They see how far it is form other objects and find it that way. I think there is also somthing with blue shifts and red shifts.
    Triangulation, I bet.
    they don't know...science is nothing more than guesswork, backed up by pompous degrees, tweed jackets with leather elbow patches, and that facial expression of deep thought that also can be seen on constipated dogs...the distance of objects is immaterial...how many light years away a given object is pales in comparison to how well you relate to objects and people in your own life...forget science, it's just another way to distract you from what's real and significant

    What is the speed at which the acceleration of a falling object terminates because air friction becomes equal?

    to the pull of gravity?





    (weight)What is the speed at which the acceleration of a falling object terminates because air friction becomes equal?
    terminates is the key word.





    Answer is terminal velocity.What is the speed at which the acceleration of a falling object terminates because air friction becomes equal?
    Terminal Velocity.

    What does not change when an unbalnced force acts on a object?

    please help me.What does not change when an unbalnced force acts on a object?
    With no opposing force acting on it, the object will continue to move in the direction of the applied force by Newton's First Law. Because force is equal to mass x acceleration, if the force is constant the acceleration of the object will also remain constant by Newton's Second Law.

    What are the formulas to find the force exerted on an object. [PLEASE READ FOR DETAILS]?

    A 2g bullet leaves the barrel of a gun @ a speed of 500 m/s. If the length of the barrel is 50 cm, find the average force exerted on the bullet by the expanding gases as the bullet moves the length of the barrel. [I DONT KNOW THE FORMULAS OR HOW TO FIGURE THIS OUT. HELP PLEASE!]What are the formulas to find the force exerted on an object. [PLEASE READ FOR DETAILS]?
    A bit more illumination:


    Assuming the acceleration of the bullet to be constant,


    a = V虏/2x = 500虏/(2*.5) = 250000 m/s虏





    F = m*a = .002kg*250000 m/s虏 = 500 NWhat are the formulas to find the force exerted on an object. [PLEASE READ FOR DETAILS]?
    force= mass x acceleration
  • liquid color try
  • itch cream
  • How do I make a picture black and white, but the object show in color if using Adobe Photoshop Elements 6.0?

    This question gets asked so often! Okay, here is how you do it and you will not destroy anything to make correcting mistakes impossible.





    Open you photo and File %26gt; Duplicate. Close the original. With the the Duplicate, look in the Layer palette. There you will see a half white half black circle, click on it. Or Layer %26gt; New Adjustment Layer. Either way, select the Hue/Saturation as the adjustment layer type.





    In the window that pops up, DO NOT have Colorize checked and slide the Saturation slide all the way to the left. It will appear as a black and white. Click OK. In the Layer palette, you will see to layers, the Background layer with the color in the photo showing and the Hue/Saturation layer with a large white rectangle. Click once on the white rectangle.





    Your colors at the bottom of the Tool palette should be black and white. Make the black the foreground color. Select the Brush tool set the size of the brush and the hardiness and start painting where you want the color from the Background layer to appear. If you mess up and paint somewhere that you don't want color, switch the color to white and paint over the mess up.





    Cool.

    A net force of 20 N acts on an object of mass 10kg. (a) what is the acceleration produced on the object? and?

    If the object is initially at rest, how far will it travel 4 s after the force acts on the object?A net force of 20 N acts on an object of mass 10kg. (a) what is the acceleration produced on the object? and?
    Use F = m* a. Divide by m and you have your acceleration in m/s^2.





    David


    http://quantummechanicsdemystified.blogs鈥?/a>

    What is used to track the time it takes for an object to move?

    A stopwatch?What is used to track the time it takes for an object to move?
    Brian already swooped in and took my answer!





    a stopwatch!

    Has anyone seen an object move by itself because of ouija board?

    I mean, without fingers touching anythingHas anyone seen an object move by itself because of ouija board?
    Nope, Ouija boards are just parlor games. Though, I do know how to move it without anyone knowing.....it is really funny to scare the crap out of my friends.Has anyone seen an object move by itself because of ouija board?
    No, I haven't,but I do know that ruled. I had one a very long time ago. I realized that something was not right. I de believe Satan had some kind of ruling over the ouija board.
    The fact that ouija boards are sold in toy shops is a bit of a give away. :)





    Practicing Shaman... quantum physics rocks.
    I knew someone who said it did back in the 70's when they were popular.

    In scattering , can any object be treated as a quantumic particle with a momentum and a state?

    In quantum there is the topic ';scattering '; in which the particles are treated with a quantum state and momentum so that the calcualtions of incoming and outgoing flux ( probability) are made...In other word, can we investigate the states of any object such as a ball after coliision with other object in the quantum manner?In scattering , can any object be treated as a quantumic particle with a momentum and a state?
    Yes, any object can, in theory, be treated as a single ';state'; that is scattered from some potential, with some probability that it ends up in a given direction. Of course, for an object (such as a billiard ball) of macroscopic size, the only final states with any reasonable probability are those for which the result is near ';classical';. And writing the initial state of a collection of ~10^23 particles that make up a macroscopic object as a single state (without approximation) is essentially impossible.





    In other words, you COULD treat an everyday collision involving macroscopic objects as a quantum scattering problem, but you'd certainly be better off with classical mechanics for such situations; the probability of the actual result deviating from the classical result by even a tiny amount is pretty much zero.

    What is the oldest object in your house?

    Whilst I wanted to answer the woman sitting in the rocking chair near me, she is not an object (although she is almost 80).





    So, I'll have to say my great grandmother's mink stole.What is the oldest object in your house?
    my husband, a year and 16 days older than me, but still the oldest thing here.What is the oldest object in your house?
    myself a Relic from 1944 still active but wont make much cash on antiques roadshow.
    A jade bracelet.
    A rocking chair from my Grandmother;115 yrs old now.
    your tongue
    a kimono from the 1930's
    the house it's self.
    Me!
    my dad


    he's 75
    coins
    my grandpa.
    wow,i'm really not sure
  • liquid color try
  • itch cream
  • Can a private tenant object to planning permission?

    Flat above car showroom, showroom now being made into two flats.


    can ido anything as a tenant who has been living in the flat above for thirteen years. (ashored tennant no written agreement)Can a private tenant object to planning permission?
    As a resident and not based on your status, yes you can object to any planning application that is likely to affect where you live. Planning applications are for everyone to inspect and anyone can object to them. Your objection will have more influence if you actually live in the area that could be affected by the application.





    I say go for if you feel that the change of usage will have an affect on you.Can a private tenant object to planning permission?
    You can object, but it may come better from your landlord.





    Mind you you may struggle to get anyone to notice you if you have no agreement. You might wanna get that sorted first.
    of course.... anyone can object!
    Well, you can leave. That's the advantage of not having a lease, the disadvantage being everything else. And equally, you can be evicted if you try to make trouble.


    Besides, a car showroom doesn't sound like a good neighbor. Also, what do you mean ';ashored';?
    Can't understand why you would want to object but yes of course you can have your say as it affects you. However, your comments have to be put in writing to the planning department and your letter will then become a public document available for anyone to see (best not to be too personal about anyone in the circumstances)h. Your objections also have to be on purely planning grounds, i,e, noise, parking, density, amenity space and such like.
    you have every right to object, regardless of your status.
    shouldn't think you have a leg to stand on.
    deal w/ it.....its not your property.
    Speak with your Landlord about it because I think he should rightfully be putting an objection in, as the owner. You could perhaps come up with something between you and he would possibly allow you to forward this objection on his behalf.

    What is the rate at which the speed of an object changes called?

    It is accelaration .





    In physics, acceleration is defined as the rate of change of velocity.





    It is thus a vector quantity with dimension length/time虏.





    In SI units, acceleration is measured in metres/second虏 (m路s-虏) using an accelerometer.





    The term ';acceleration'; generally refers to the change in instantaneous velocity.





    But why is it in botany section ?What is the rate at which the speed of an object changes called?
    acceleration is the rate of change of velocity





    It includes change of direction as well as change of speedWhat is the rate at which the speed of an object changes called?
    ACCELERATION
    acceleration when there is an increase in speed,





    deceleration if there is a decrease in speed
    acceleration?

    Orbiting a small object around the sun?

    Is it possible to orbit a small object around the sun, lets say a small satellite. If possible how?Orbiting a small object around the sun?
    There are man made satellites in solar orbits. For example, the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) satellite:





    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOHO_spacec鈥?/a>





    The way that you put any spacecraft into a circular orbit around any celestial body is pretty much the same. First, you launch the spacecraft into a trajectory that is tangent to the desired circle at some point, and then when the spacecraft reaches that point, you either speed it up, or slow it down (whichever is necessary) so that it will follow the circular trajectory from then on.





    The concern expressed by Alwin is that not every possible orbit around the sun is a STABLE orbit. A satellite in an unstable orbit would be influenced by the gravity of the planets, which would cause it to leave the desired circular path.





    The SOHO spacecraft sits near the Earth/Sun L1 'lagrangian' point which means that its orbit around the sun is both stable, and synchronous with the orbit of the Earth.





    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_鈥?/a>








    Alexis,





    Yes, it's technically true that ';all objects in the solar system orbit the sun,'; but that's not how we usually speak of them. The Earth and the Moon, for example, do a slow dance around one another as they both orbit the sun, but most people would prefer to describe the situation by saying that, ';The Moon orbits the Earth.';Orbiting a small object around the sun?
    PRACTICALLY IT IS NOT POSSIBLE AS IF A SATELLITE WANT TO ORBIT AROUND THE SUN IT SHOULD BE FREE FROM OUTER FORCES POWERFUL THAN SUN'S. SO IF IT REACHES NEAR ANY PLANET IT WILL BE ATTRACTED BY THE PLANETS CORE AND HENCE WILL LOOSE THE ORBIT. IF IT SHOULD REVOLVE AROUND THE SUN IT MUST BE NEARER TO THE SUN AND AWAY FROM OTHER PLANETS BUT IF IT REACHES CROSS VENUS DISTANCE FROM THE SUN IT WILL BURN OFF BY THE HEAT OF SUN.
    All objects in the Solar System are in orbit around the Sun.





    If you mean is it possible for a satellite to orbit the Sun without being gravitationally bound to another object in the Solar System, yes, it is most certainly possible.
    Yes.





    The Helios satellites were objects that fit your specifications.

    What is the object we have the most microscopic photo of, I've seen on of a single gold atom, any smaller?

    If you mean a conventional photo, then it is a carbon atom. If however you include particle tracks, even transient particles like pions and muons have been detected.

    What is an object that appears not to move and is used to judge motion?

    An object that appears not to move and is used to judge motion?? what is the answer.. i need it in about 10 mins for mii science hw..??? plzzWhat is an object that appears not to move and is used to judge motion?
    Is this a trick question ? there isn't anything in the universe that we know of that 'doesn't move' (or that we can prove that it doesn't move -- so if we can't prove it, we can't know if it is moving or not).





    If the entire universe was moving sideways at 20 mph (or faster), everything would look the same to us as as if it wasn't moving. This is one of the things that Einstein talked about in his theory of relativity (he showed that you can't use light, and it's speed, to determine if something is moving), and Galileo talked about this in the 1600's (his example: being inside a ship sailing so smoothly that you can't tell if it is moving or not -- except if you have a window/porthole to look out of).





    So we judge motion in relation to other objects. So a cop uses his radar gun to measure a car's speed in relation to (relative to) the street. The street doesn't appear to be moving, so we just talk about how fast the car is moving. In reality, the street IS moving -- it's part of the Earth, which is orbiting the sun, moving rapidly that way, and is also spinning, moving in a second way.





    So all motion is judged in relation to something else. What you pick depends on what seems to make sense for the measurement you are making. The object you compare to (usually the Earth, like the cop does when he gives you a speeding ticket) is called the 'reference point';.





    hope this helps.

    What happens when an unstoppable force meets a unmovable object?

    Where did I come up with this question?





    Hint......It came from a movie, but what movie?What happens when an unstoppable force meets a unmovable object?
    The Dark KnightWhat happens when an unstoppable force meets a unmovable object?
    I gave a great answer and you blow me off





    Witch!!!! Report Abuse

    What happens when an unstoppable force meets a unmovable object?





    She finally gives in and marries Her !!!
    The unstoppable force would just deflect and go to anotherd irection since it can't be stopped and also it can't move the unmovable object.
    ^


    ^


    ^


    Pocket Protectorate meets Kiki...





    And Godzilla farts...
    Oh baby it is one hellofa BANG!!!! lol





    Did Frank Sinatra say this in a song or one of his movies? Just can't quite remember.
    imagine me and you


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF_JdTgBY鈥?/a>
    not sure but im gonna say some superhero movie.
    SOMETHING'S GOTTA GIVE
    i guess the force would go through it like a bullet goes through a person.
    Why so serious?
    They shake hands and go on their way!
    I think you and I are destined to do this forever.
  • liquid color try
  • itch cream
  • Can the subject-object polarity ever be resolved? If so, how?

    I think it is the source of all human misery. A person should never be reduced into an object by a subject or as a subject reduce another person into an object! I think faith is the transcendence of the object and the subject.





    Is sex about the resolution of this subject-object polarity or division?Can the subject-object polarity ever be resolved? If so, how?
    This is a fallacy that a many philosophers have gone to great lengths to perpetuate. Objectivity encompasses the material and the moral; objective reality exists and does not change to suit our opinions. To the extent that we discover and correctly identify the nature of an entity, we learn how to act in accordance with these properties and manipulate them to suit our purposes.





    Subjectivity is limited to the realm of preferences. You might prefer scotch to bourbon etc, but there is no right and wrong here.





    Faith means to believe something in spite of or in contradiction to the facts of reality; the opposite of reason. The irrational transcends anything it feels like.





    ';Sex is a physical capacity, but its exercise is determined by man's mind - by his choice of values, held consciously or subconsciously. To a rational man, sex is an expression of self-esteem - a celebration of himself and of existence. To the man that lacks self-esteem, sex is an attempt to fake it, to acquire its momentary illusion.





    Romantic love, in the full sense of the term, is an emotion possible only to the man or woman of unbreached self-esteem: it is his response to his own highest values in the person of another - an integrated response of mind and body, of love and sexual desire. Such a man or woman is incapable of experiencing a sexual desire divorced from spiritual values.';Can the subject-object polarity ever be resolved? If so, how?
    What is bad? All things[science aside] have an opposite reaction, so what is bad is some way or another good. There isn't always the same outcome though, that good reaction could always be bad to someone else, and so forth. It is all in how we choose to deal with these problems. We must decide to stay who we are regardless of what happens.
    All is one. We just need to remember that this is the truth.





    love and blessings Don
    This question needs some clarifying.





    - What exactly do you mean by subject-object polarity? It seems you're thinking of objectifying other people, but I don't want to presume too much.





    - *Why* do you perceive such a polarity as bad? In some cases it's necessary. Surgeons have to think of the body in a way not unlike mechanics think of cars. Putting the question into some context might help make the meaning clearer.





    -Must this polarity be exclusive? A surgeon regards the patient in this ';mechanical'; way, but never once pretends that this is anything other than a flesh-and-blood person before them.





    Your statement about faith needs unpacking. How does it transcend object and subject? I'm not quite sure what you're getting at.





    Your question about sex I find more interesting, perhaps because it seems closer to my initial, ';off-the-cuff'; understanding of the main issue. Without going into it, I'd give it a qualified yes. (Email me if you really are interested.)
    that doesn't even make any sense! imagine if all of us were subjects and not objects. how could that even be possible? everyone would be doing something but they'd be in their own little universe and nothing they did would even be perceived by others.





    and if we were all objects, which we are, but no one was a subject, then life just wouldn't be! because everything we do is a reaction to something else. life is a reaction to something else. so if there hadn't been that initial push, nothing would have happened.





    life needs that ';subject-object polarity'; in order to be.





    oh, and sex in general is not either a resolution or a division. it varies from couple to couple.
    A subject is the journey and the object is the destination, so we are taking many steps that lead us to our eventual afterglow.
    Due to the nature of the subject-object polarity, you cannot ';resolve it'; because your mind is dependent upon subject-object polarity in the first place - and you would need to use your mind to answer that question intellectually.





    Your last question itself is a subject-object type question. Sex is a physical act. That is it. Nothing more, nothing less. Subject-object polarity will make you think there is ';more'; to it (i.e. sex IS the resolution....) or ';less'; to it (i.e. sex IS NOT the resolution). Sex being the object and whether you think it is or is not the resolution being the subject.
    By flushing the philosophy book down the toilet one page at a time then getting out and doing some good for your fellow human being.
    yes. when one is not incarnate or in a state of nirvana.

    Determine the density of an unknown by submerging the object in water?

    Determine the density of an unknown by submerging the object in water?


    My teacher gave us an unknown. We tied it to a string and measured the tension in the string while the object was hanging in the air. We then submerged the object in water and measured the tension in the string again. How do we now determine the density of the unknown object?





    tension of string (air) - .855N


    tension of string (water) - .817N


    mass of unk - 25.6g


    density of water - 1000kg/m3Determine the density of an unknown by submerging the object in water?
    From the original Tension:





    Tension (air) = Weight of unknown = mass x g


    Therefore, mass = Tension(air)/g = 0.855/9.81 = 0.0872 kg





    The difference in the tension(water) and tension (air) is due to the upthrust of the water. From the Archimedes principle, this can give you the volume.





    Upthrust = tension(air) - tension(water) = 0.855 - 0.817= 0.038N





    but from archimedes principle:





    Upthrust = density of water x volume displaced x g


    [the volume displaced is equal to the volume of your object]





    Therefore volume = upthrust / (density of water x g) = 0.038 / (1000x 9.81) = 3.87 e-6 m3





    Therefore density of unknown = mass / volume = 0.0872 / 3.87e-6 = 22520 kg/m3

    How does a object obtain gravity on their own ?

    despite what 'top-notch' quantum theorists might think, still the most likely explanation for this is Einsteins General Relativity.





    This states that anything with mass will have an effect on space-time. This 'bending' of spacetime is what causes objects to seem attracted to each other - it is an extremely complicated matter involving very hard maths. Long and short it is due to objects moving in a strait line, along curved paths....Matter tells space how to bend, and space tells matter how to move.





    As of yet, not a single experiment has been found to contradict Einsteins equations, and not a single other theory can even come close to explaining/predicting what Einstein did.





    So, in summary, gravity finds its origin in the warping of space-time by massive objects.How does a object obtain gravity on their own ?
    This is a very interesting question.





    Do you mean ';How does an object like the moon obtain gravity';. Assuming there is no other object present?





    Newton proposed that two bodies with masses M and m separated by a distance d have a force of attraction between them of F = GMm/d^2 where G is the gravitational constant.


    He didn't know why this force existed and nobody knows to this day. Electrostatic forces are well-known as there is an exchange of particles between the objects.


    There must be an exchange of particles between the masses and this is the Higgs boson. They are looking for this at CERN to verify the theory about the nature of matter.


    This is a most difficult area of physics. Einstein said that matter curved space and curved space ';caused'; gravity but he did not know then what is known now about the fundamental forces.


    Unified field theory is the goal for the clever theoretical physicistsHow does a object obtain gravity on their own ?
    Gravity is a function of mass; I don't believe anyone seems to know what the origin of gravity is, it's just that the greater the mass, the greater the gravity an object has.
    Ben is 100% right